Why I recommend physiotherapy to my patients

Let me start off by stating that I have no financial stake in the success of physiotherapy as a profession.

Last week, a patient came in with uncomplicated mechanical back pain of one week’s duration, with no red flags, and asked about seeing someone for “therapy”. I’m going to share with you exactly what I told her.

When I refer a patient to a specialist of any kind, I am asking their help with a very specific question. When that issue is resolved or stabilized, the patient’s care is returned back to me. This is the basic model of primary care that works well, given our skill sets. Everyone within the circle of care is evidence-based, which creates a sense of trust among the providers.

When I refer a patient to physiotherapy, for the most part I know exactly what my patients are getting into. They will focus on evidence-based strengthening, stretching, sport or activity-specific rehabilitation, and will give the patient home exercises to work on where possible. The patient is never asked for a pre-payment for a large block of treatments. The therapy proposed is for the minimum duration, and its continuation is largely determined by patient preference. If the treatment is not improving things as expected, there will often be communication with the primary care physician to ask for suggestions.

This is the physical therapy model that works for my patients, and improves patient outcomes while still being evidence-based. I know that when I send my patients to physiotherapy, they will not be sold supplements, herbal remedies, fad diets, or be encouraged to sign up for expensive “wellness programs”. I know that they will not be signed up for long-term commitments, detoxes, and full-body x-rays. I know that the physiotherapist will not encourage them to bring their whole family to them for regular “adjustments”. I know that the physiotherapist will not try to use physiotherapy to treat ear infections, asthma, and improve their immune system.

And most importantly, I know that the physiotherapist will not spend the majority of their visit disparaging vaccines, medications, and “Western Medicine”.

It’s fairly clear that I’m making not-so-subtle references to some of the practices of some chiropractors in North America. But before I get bombarded with hate mail, please hear me out.

For acute musculoskeletal injuries, there is fairly broad consensus that manual therapy does improve pain, whether it be from physiotherapy, massage therapy or chiropractic care. And patients are adamant about this. The therapy for the most part does work to decrease pain. But the means by which it improves pain is where the disagreement lies. It is not through adjustments of so-called subluxations, or by improving energy flow, or any other fanciful non-evidence-based explanation. Manual therapy improves pain largely through a neurophysiologic model that is achieved through any form of manual therapy, both through central and peripheral mechanisms. No magic, and no need for lifelong treatment for maintenance. Home stretching and strengthening programs for “maintenance” should be the standard after acute treatment.

I like to think I’m a fairly reasonable family physician. I am deeply passionate about nutrition and exercise, and discuss this with patients at almost every visit. I promote yoga, meditation, and mindfulness….not because they possess any magical powers above placebo, but because they get my patients to relax. I suggest free resources for all of these things wherever possible. It is my responsibility to ensure a patient’s treatment course is safe, effective, and cheap. I understand the financial motivation behind the messaging that physicians are evil and anything “holistic” is good, but it’s a false dichotomy and not rooted in any truth.

I know that many chiropractors do limit their practice to short-term musculoskeletal treatment and evidence-based health promotion, and I want to give them an opportunity to set themselves apart from the rest of the herd. Chirobase.org provides an excellent guide to some of the issues surrounding chiropractic care, and where there is and isn’t evidence to support it.   They also provide these guidelines for what patients should ensure their chiropractor practices:

My practice is limited to the care of musculoskeletal problems. I may also counsel patients about lifestyle improvements and give practical science-based tips about the management of common ailments. My approach to back pain parallels the AHCPR Clinical Practice Guidelines that lie within the scope of chiropractic. For medical problems outside my scope, I refer patients to appropriate physicians.

I publicly endorse immunization, fluoridation, and other standard public health measures. I reject biotheistic notions that “subluxations” and/or “nerve interference” are the cause or underlying cause of disease. I do not make claims about curing earaches or any other diseases. I do not (a) use free screening examinations as a patient-recruiting tactic, (b) try get patients to sign contracts for lengthy treatment, (c) promote regular “preventive” adjustments,(d) use scare tactics, or (e) disparage scientific medical treatment. I do not routinely perform or order x-ray examinations because most patients do not need them. I do not utilize 14″ x 36″ full-spine x-ray examinations.

I do not offer or advocate the use of Biological Terrain Assessment, computerized “nutrient deficiency” testing, contact reflex analysiscontour analysis (also called moire contourography), cytotoxic testingother improper allergy testingblind spot mappingelectro interstitial scanning,electrodermal screening, Functional Intracellular Analysis (FIA), hair analysisherbal crystallization analysisiridologyleg-length testing (to check for “subluxations”), live blood cell analysis (also called nutritional blood analysis or Hemaview), testing with a Nervo-ScopeNutrabalanceNUTRI-SPEC, pendulum divination, provoked testing for toxic metalsreflexology, saliva testing, spinal ultrasound testing to “measure progress,” surface electromyography (SEMG)thermography, testing with a Toftness device, weighing on a twin-scale device (Spinal Analysis Machine), or any other diagnostic procedure that is unsubstantiated and lacks a scientifically plausible rationale.

I do not utilize or promote acupuncture to “balance meridians” or treat disease. I do not use or advocate the use of Activator Methodsapplied kinesiologyauriculotherapyBio Energetic Synchronization Technique (B.E.S.T.)chelation therapyChiropractic Biophysics® (CBP®), colonic irrigationcranial or craniosacral therapy, laser acupuncture, magnetic or biomagnetic therapy, Neuro Emotional Technique (NET)Neural Organization Technique (NOT)NeuroCranial Restructuring (NCR), NeuroModulation technique (NMT), or any other treatment modality that is unsubstantiated and lacks a scientifically plausible rationale. I do not advertise or offer expensive courses of treatment with spinal decompression machines. I do not “prescribe” homeopathic products. I do not sell or promote the use of unproven dietary supplements or herbal products for the treatment of disease.

I invite any chiropractors to check out this page, and add their name to that directory if they agree with the above guidelines.

Currently, I refer to physiotherapists because I know what my patients are getting with them. Health care decisions should be based on evidence, not anecdotes of benefit.

I’ll close with this passage from Harriet Hall from Science-Based Medicine:

What if chiropractic had policed its own ranks, limited itself to providing only short-term treatment for certain types of musculoskeletal pain, worked hard to determine which manipulation techniques were most effective, abandoned techniques that it found ineffective, and denounced vaccine rejection, applied kinesiology, and other forms of quackery? Manipulation might have been more widely accepted as a therapeutic tool if it had not been so tainted by the company it kept. Chiropractors could have become “physical therapists for the back,” experts in manipulation that MDs could refer patients to with confidence.  Chiropractic might have been integrated into the medical mainstream just like osteopathy and optometry, but it didn’t even try.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Why I recommend physiotherapy to my patients

  1. Marie

    As a chiropractic student I would suggest you speak with a chiropractor who uses evidence-based techniques in order to treat their patients. I would expect you may find that your current view of the profession is somewhat outdated. I can assure you that the majority of chiropractic students and graduates that I have been acquainted with have very similar outlooks on patient care as physiotherapists.

    Like

    Reply
    1. supermarioelia Post author

      Hi Marie,

      Thanks for the comment. I appreciate that there are many quality chiropractors who limit their practices to evidence-based care. Those that do are welcome to add their name to the directory at chirobase.org and declare their commitment to evidence-based practices. I can assure you that my experiences are not outdated, as I have patients see me on a regular basis who continue to tell me of non-evidence-based practices performed by local chiropractors.

      I would challenge chiropractors who do follow evidence-based practices to encourage their college to discipline those who engage in less-than-reputable business practices.

      Like

      Reply
  2. Lenx

    Hi Dr. Mario Elia,

    I agree with all your points, but I think your title can be misleading for non-healthcare professionals. It can also cause friction with chiropractors who studies and practices under an evidence based model. Maybe instead of saying you would only recommend physiotherapy, you can say that you would only recommend your patients to physiotherapist and evidence based chiropractors (especially when you are able to recognize that there is a group of chiropractors at chirobase.org that are honouring their scope of practice and duty to treat).

    I am sure our healthcare system can use more appropriate access to care. Hence, I challenge you to place all three professions and their unique expertise together, instead of pulling them away from each other.

    Lenx

    Like

    Reply
    1. supermarioelia Post author

      Hi Lenx,

      I think your comment is spot-on with the need to bring all health care professionals and their expertise together. The reason for the title was that the article is an explanation directed at my patients for why I recommend physiotherapy over chiropractic here in my community, based on my lack of comfort with chiropractors in my community. If it’s any consolation, my original title was going to be “Why I recommend physiotherapy and not chiropractic”, which I recognized would be incredibly inflammatory and inappropriate.

      Like

      Reply
  3. Marie

    Hello supermarioelia,

    Thank you for you’re reply. I am sorry to hear that some of your patients have had a less then pleasant experience with the chiropractic profession. Unfortunately there are a subset of people in every profession who practice in a way that is not agreed upon by that profession as a whole. For this reason I feel that education and information are two important tools that we have at our disposal as health care professionals. I appreciate that you mentioned the directory in your post as that is a great way to show the public how to access members of the profession who do use evidence-based therapy.
    I would encourage you to, instead of writing off the profession as a whole to your patients, find a chiropractor in your area whose practice style you agree with and add them to your referral network. As different injury types and individual preferences and responses to treatments vary greatly I feel it would be a disservice to a patient to not allow them to make an educated decision regarding their health care.
    As a personal example I had an injury that a physiotherapist told me could not be treated and I would be in pain for the rest of my life. Not ever having an experience with chiropractors I did not even think of them as an option. Thankfully my family doctor suggested I try a chiropractor who had me pain-free in a month and I have not needed treatment for that injury since.
    I do not mean to say that chiropractic is the be-all-end all of the rehabilitation field but it does have its place and I implore you to provide your patients will the information to be able to make an educated choice.

    Like

    Reply
  4. LloydChiro

    The problem is, how does a primary physician who is acting in the best interest of her patients find who the good chiropractors are? And, why should she go through all of the trouble of searching when she knows exactly what to expect from her local physical therapist?

    I’m shaking my head in disgust at my fellow chiropractors rather than the PTs who are trying to use our tools more and more. Life would be so much better if we could hold our heads high as a trusted profession rather than the fringe group that we remain. It’s up to us if we want to keep claiming our title as doctor.

    Like

    Reply
  5. Dave Nicholls

    Reblogged this on Critical Physiotherapy and commented:
    In this blogpost, Dr Mario Elia talks about the reasons he supports referral to physiotherapy. I’ve re-blogged it here not because he waves a flag for physiotherapy – which is all well and good – but that he portrays physiotherapy as a safe pair of hands: consistent, predictable and reliable.
    “When I refer a patient to physiotherapy, for the most part I know exactly what my patients are getting into.”
    While this might be the fantasy of our regulatory bodies, part of me wonders if being so conservative is such a great thing in the 21st century. Is there something about the embodied, sensual nature of health and illness that is elided when you have a strong, dependable professional identity? Is there space for a form of physiotherapy practice that is more fluid and less ‘foundational,’ more passionate and less constrained; more about desire and less about discipline?

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s